00:34:23 Emily Perry: could you please zoom in on the abutter documents 00:36:17 smcelhinney: Can you explain the vertical and horizontal axis on one as an example 00:43:23 Ben Schechter: fence is ugly and in front of trees. how visible is it from houses 00:44:29 smcelhinney: adding on to above question, fence tops out at 380 feet and building at 412 feet 00:45:09 Emily Perry: It looks like the building will be visible over the trees from the houses. I would like to see a to-scale rendering of the trees/fence/building view from the back yard of the most negatively affected house. 00:45:16 Brad: Brad - How will the water quality be improved? How many thousands of gallons will this facility use on a daily basis? 00:45:18 James Bruce: how many feet from the abutters property lines to the line of evergreen trees 00:46:09 Brett Fagan: Agree with what Emily is asking for. Need to see the view from the neighboring properties sight lines 00:47:01 Ben Schechter: will the 600k building also have a 52 foot variance. 00:47:30 Emily Perry: @ben - yes they're asking for 52 across the whole site. 00:48:22 Ben Schechter: would the developer be willing to float balloons to see height from tops of both buildings. 00:49:31 Ben Schechter: there seem to be a large number of parking spaces. we are concerned over traffic congestion on 16 00:49:45 smcelhinney: You mentioned the Avery Dennison site earlier, how close is the closest house to that property? 00:50:46 Cherie: It appears the trees shown in proposal are mature height. But how large would the trees be at planting, and how many years before the mature height is achieved? 00:50:49 smcelhinney: How long is the construction plan and what hours will the construction take place during? 00:51:06 James Bruce: who is occupying the building? what type of business do they conduct? 00:51:29 Emily Perry: if the building is above the tree line, do you have a cut showing the distance of the projected light pollution toward the neighborhood? 00:51:31 smcelhinney: What are the proposed working hours of the warehouse when completed? 00:51:32 William: William Keith Patterson 100 Monroe Drive, 00:52:14 James Bruce: can you please share actual numbers for evergreen ft to abutters line. The response was 50ft but can we see drawings of this please 00:53:38 Ben Schechter: will the right of way from Jackson drive be developed and what will stop traffic to development? 00:53:54 Robert Travers: Not clear on distance from 600,000 building to closest house in Holliston Woods 00:54:00 Marco: Peter are you willing to meet with the trustees of Holliston Woods as well as owners to further explain especially the impact of sight from the unit owners on Jackson Drive to the project 00:54:39 Jason Duguay: What steps will they be taking to mitigate light and noise pollution? 00:56:14 Brett Fagan: except in the fall when the leaves fall off the trees 00:56:39 Emily Perry: The elevation you showed shows the building clearly taller than the trees. 00:57:26 Brad: Brad - Can you tell us what will be stored in these warehouses? 00:57:41 Thomas Schuler: Will there be blasting with the construction? 01:00:17 Brad: Brad - When is this construction to be completed? 01:04:19 smcelhinney: You talked about the Holliston water but we are on wells in Medway, how will this effect our water? 01:05:11 gabriellepecher: What about big ac units on the roofs? 01:06:24 Emily Perry: Aren't any AC or rooftop units supposed to be included in the 52 ft? 01:07:32 Marco: Peter mentioned that the 600k building is 650 feet from Jackson Drive so how far is the 800K distance 01:09:50 Robert Travers: When would construction start on the 600k building 01:10:11 smcelhinney: Would it be possible to somehow move the warehouse further from the houses if they are requesting a height increase? 01:13:40 Grossman: Question: will we in Holliston Woods be able to see either building from the neighborhood or will teh evergreens block site of the buildings? 01:14:02 soulierefamily: Why weren’t abutters notified of Planning Board hearings? 01:15:42 John Giacobbe: How far will both buildings be from Summit Rd? 01:18:15 gabriellepecher: can I see where stable way is on the map? We are at 30 stable way 01:18:16 SLee: Being that the project presentation includes the DOT study and improvements to RT 16, the project obviously contemplates significant motor vehicle traffic. Without an occupancy commitment, can you speak more specifically to what is contemplated re traffic impacts? 01:20:44 Brett Fagan: just FYI - You can view the docs they've been showing here: https://www.townofholliston.us/zoning-board-of-appeals/pages/upcoming-public-hearings-decisions 01:20:53 Chris Canney: To clarify what Karen said: a use for the buildings has not yet been proposed. General Industrial uses for a building of this size (which is most likely what will be proposed) DO require a Special Permit from the Planning Board. At this stage of the process, the developers opted to apply for Site Plan Review before applying for the Special Permit. 01:23:30 gabriellepecher: Are all of those parking spaces? 01:25:57 gabriellepecher: if were reading correctly it looks like 130 parking spaces on the back wall? That a lot of cars for warehouse space? Is there future plans? 01:26:34 smcelhinney: So how tall will the spruce trees be that you are planning to plant. Maybe that will answer the tree question 01:27:32 James Bruce: will there be security cameras on roof pointed towards abutters 01:28:19 smcelhinney: 423 truck spaces per the plan 01:28:30 smcelhinney: 129 passenger plans 01:28:34 smcelhinney: cars 01:28:56 soulierefamily: And 170 loading docks… 01:32:00 Robert Travers: The additional feet will be seen from the HW residents during the winter season 01:33:40 smcelhinney: Will abutters be notified by mail of the decision? 01:34:32 Emily Perry: thank you . 01:35:44 Chris Canney: wrong address. 1490 Washington St 01:43:21 Ellen Troland: also rv 01:44:27 Chris Canney: Any use not specifically enumerated in the bylaw shall be deemed prohibited per Section I-B. 01:44:50 chrisboggess: I live on Fiske St. and there are at least 25 massive tractor trailer trucks and dump trucks that pass by our house - from Lowland to Central and back daily. This is a residental neighborhood and this type of traffic is very noisy (jake brakes), dirty and unsafe. May people walk their dogs and ride their bikes on our street and it is unsafe. 01:46:43 chrisboggess: Does ARM do business with Wyman and O’Dell trucking companies? 01:46:47 Anne-Marie Dorning: So is Mr. Brumber alleging it only happened once? 01:46:59 Michael Barry: mr Bromberg drives his truck to his facility via woodland Street several times per week, not just one time, several months ago. 01:47:02 AudreaH_Szabatura@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU: truck traffic on Fiske, Woodland, etc is a long standing issue not unique to this one day in which the violation was filed 01:47:43 Ellen Troland: trucks should not be accessing his business either via woodland either, right? 01:47:49 Michael Barry: apologize, Mr Bromber. 01:48:26 chrisboggess: Does ARM do business with Wyman and O’Dell trucking companies? 01:48:42 Toni Stone: I'd like to add that Bullard st is used as a cut through for trucks and the traffic is unsafe for this residential road. 01:48:45 Anne-Marie Dorning: The document in question is 42 pages long 01:51:03 Ellen Troland: cant u put sign up saying no right turn for commercial vehicles? 01:54:13 chrisboggess: Does AMR do business with O’Dell and Wyman Trucking? 01:54:48 chrisboggess: These are the massive 18 wheelers that are using jake brakes etc. 01:56:20 Ellen Troland: the usual trucks are big dump trucks like cordani, or laffin. not sure other businesses use these type of vehicles 01:56:25 AudreaH_Szabatura@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU: They are coming and leaving with asphalt or dirt.....I'm not sure what other site they would be going to in the park? 02:01:22 Michael Barry: I have followed full dump trucks from the Sherbrooke side of rte 16, pass Whitney street and take a left onto woodland and lowland and go directly to mr brumbers business. 02:01:25 Ellen Troland: wasn't condition put there for a reason 02:02:47 Michael Barry: these are not just 10 wheel dumps this also includes 18 wheel fully loaded trucks passing quickly over the rail trail crossing. we need this to be addressed before there is an accident and someone is hurt. 02:04:41 chrisboggess: We need to keep residential roads safe!! 02:05:08 Michael Barry: if they are doing business with mr brumber, they are in his direct control. his permits states a travel route, he must enforce this condition. 02:05:14 K. Langton: This is focusing on his trucks but the permit says all trucks 02:05:27 K. Langton: this is a condition to his permit 02:05:49 K. Langton: according to a later from Jay Marsden this is a repeated problem 02:06:10 Toni Stone: Are we to assume that other business on Lowland have the same restrictions? 02:06:12 Ellen Troland: even more important with bike trails and community farm in area 02:06:46 Toni Stone: Can we post signs that say no commercial vehicles and have the police site the drivers 02:07:34 chrisboggess: Does it take is an accident to change this? We need road restrictions in our residential neighborhoods. 02:07:55 Michael Barry: if his business if fined, he can take it up with the trucks causing his being fined. the town has given him conditions to work with, it is his responsibility enforce it with his vendors. t 02:08:02 K. Langton: This is a repeated issue…these trucks park at said location and go in and out of 157 many times in one day…we are talking about repeated movement 02:08:32 K. Langton: what we are talking about is the difference between a company like 555 hoping brook that wants to work with abutter and one that does not 02:09:05 Michael Barry: is his appeal granted or is it enforced? 02:10:33 Cherie: But the attorney said it was withdrawn 02:11:08 Ellen Troland: breaking bad rv 02:12:59 Ellen Troland: huge berms 02:15:19 Torres Campos, Cidhinnia: This address is not abutting where the business is located. 02:20:09 Cherie: There is a separate parking lot that was installed (unpermitted) right across the street from the permitted business (157). The vehicles that are parking on the 194 property are not all registered to the property owner, and at least a few are paying the owner to park on that spot. 02:20:59 Michael Barry: what business is permitted to operate on this property? 02:21:00 Cherie: There were NO vehicles parking on that lot before Mr. Brumber. I can testify to that, as we live right next door and have long before Mr. Brumber purchased the lot. 02:21:12 Ellen Troland: back in 2012 cars/truck were not there, no large birm just flat land 02:21:55 Cherie: All activity on that lot begn when Mr Brumber first began “managing” the land (working without permit to process rocks and other materials 02:22:06 Michael Barry: that is barely a structure. 02:22:15 Ellen Troland: are u talking about building that asbestos was removed from so it can be destroyed 02:23:09 Cherie: No, there is a large rusted metal building that was there when the sand processing company was in business 02:24:21 Ellen Troland: i have pics from 2012 to present if you need the 02:27:47 Hafford, Pat: Doesn’t the town require permits for any kind of business? 02:28:13 Torres Campos, Cidhinnia: Is there a special permit for any business on this lot? 02:28:37 Ellen Troland: that is a business on 157 02:29:14 Ellen Troland: shouldn't tenants have permits or does landowner need to permit 02:30:09 Hafford, Pat: Because there are no permits, there is no limit on noise, traffic, dust, etc. 02:30:19 Ellen Troland: still dumping going on there 02:30:56 AudreaH_Szabatura@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU: Will the mulch and other materials be removed? We just went through a lawsuit due to illegal dumping of materials, why are we here again? 02:32:24 Cherie: How many commercial vehicles can be parked on a lot before a permit is required? 02:32:57 Ellen Troland: i am still confused thought there needed to be a business and a permit there before parking would be allowed 02:33:04 K. Langton: there is no permit that relates to what is being parked there 02:33:21 Cherie: If I have a permit at one location, I now can park on other lots I own, then? 02:34:07 Torres Campos, Cidhinnia: ALL OF IT! 02:34:27 Ellen Troland: agreed, he got his materials off that he needed i thought 02:36:33 Ellen Troland: he has a business therefore he should have a permit so he can park whatever reasonable to his business from my layman's understaNDING 02:38:31 Hafford, Pat: OF course we opposed the appeal. Chris had to file papers to get action. 02:39:43 AudreaH_Szabatura@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU: We ask that the board support's Chris's violation. thank you for your time. 02:40:21 Torres Campos, Cidhinnia: Agreed, I also support Chris's violation. 02:40:25 Ellen Troland: i would like you to support chris too. 02:40:47 K. Langton: please 02:42:40 Michael Barry: i am opposed to granting the appeal. this business needs to be held accountable for the violations. he doesn't follow the conditions of his at 157 and doesn't have a permit to operate on 194 02:44:14 Ellen Troland: bridge over river will break soon